A.5. Results

The presented analysis shows the performance of the proposed geo-location algorithm based on OTDs under two different scenarios from real networks. All results consider only events that can be directly located, i.e. those reporting at least three different sites, except in Section A.5.4, where the impact of using PD measurements is studied.

A.5.1. Reported Sites per Event

The amount of different reported sites is a key factor for an event to be properly geo-located. Figure A.2 shows the Probability Density Function (PDF) of the number of reported sites per event in both scenarios. As expected, events reporting fewer sites are more common, but it is important to focus on the weight that two-site events, which cannot be directly located, have in the PDF distribution. For the scenario in US, this percentage reaches around 60%, which may indicate that this network has better dominance, i.e. lower number of interferers as compared to the network from Europe.