Free Trial

Safari Books Online is a digital library providing on-demand subscription access to thousands of learning resources.

Share this Page URL
Help

Chapter 13: Human-Centered Design For He... > Human-Centered Health Information Te... - Pg. 297

Human-Centered Design for Health Information Technology · · · patient preferences, needs, and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clini- cal decisions". Timely by "reducing waits and sometimes harmful delays for both those who receive and those who give care". Efficient by "avoiding waste, including waste of equipment, supplies, ideas, and energy". Equitable by "providing care that does not vary in quality because of personal characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socio-economic status". HUMAN-CENTERED HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Technological solutions are increasingly designed and deployed to improve the provision and deliv- ery of health care and we are now seeing an ever broader range of software, hardware and contexts of use. For example, while previously informa- tion technology was predominantly based in the consultation room, clinicians now have access to an increasing amount of information, includ- ing electronic health records, via devices such as desktops, PDAs, tablet PCs, and computers- on-wheels (e.g. McLoughlin et al., 2006; Cisco, 2007; Tang and Carpendale, 2008). The mobility of these devices means that they can be accessed on wards, by patients' bedside and during ward rounds. There has been increasing evidence that the use of health information technology (HIT) improves patient safety, quality, and continuity of care. For example, a CPOE (Computer Physician Order Entry) system deployed at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City has been reported to reduce adverse drug events by 75% (Evans et al. 1998). HIT also has the potential to improve the use of resources, such as the use of EHRs that led to reduced laboratory and radiology test orders by 9% to 14% (Bates et al., 1999), reduced hospital admissions by 2% (Jha, 2001), and reduced excessive medication usage by 11% (Teich et al., 2000). However, with information computing increas- ingly moving away from the desktop into hospital wards via mobile technologies, additional chal- lenges to designing useful and usable technologies arise. Adoption has been an enduring problem for the introduction of health care technologies. Practitioner resistance and interference has been reported to account for 45% of the failure of com- puter based health information systems (Dowling, 1980). The perceived ease of use of a technology also has a significant effect on whether a clinician will use the technology as it has a direct effect on perceived usefulness of the technology (Wu Health care systems that achieve major gains in these six areas are expected to be better-equipped to meet the ever-increasing needs of patients. The application of health information technology has been shown to improve aspects of safety and ef- ficiency (Bates and Gawande, 2003; Chaudhry et al., 2006). However barriers, including resistance to utilization, have also been reported to limit the adoption of health information technologies in the hospital setting (Jha et al., 2009). Therefore it has been suggested that to optimize their utilization and adoption, an iterative developmental-evaluative socio-technical and qualitative approach that recognizes the interrelationships between the practices of health care providers and technology is required (Berg, 1999). In the following, we will first describe why human-centered approaches are appropriate for designing health information technologies. We then describe the concerns that may arise when conducting qualitative human-centered research in health care settings, as well issues that should be considered when designing health information technologies. Finally, we illustrate these issues and considerations using a multi-stage research that we conducted to investigate information flow in a hospital ward to better inform technology design. 297