Free Trial

Safari Books Online is a digital library providing on-demand subscription access to thousands of learning resources.


  • Create BookmarkCreate Bookmark
  • Create Note or TagCreate Note or Tag
  • PrintPrint
Share this Page URL
Help

Chapter 9 - Further Attribution Issues > EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE ATTRIBUTION M...

EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE ATTRIBUTION METHODOLOGIES

The evolution of performance attribution methodologies is shown in Figure 9.2. The evolution down the page is not necessarily in chronological order but represents my preferences and interpretation of key contributions and insights.
The key stages are Brinson and Fachler in 1985, Karnosky and Singer in 1994 and the three geometric methodologies apparently developed in isolation – Burnie, Knowles and Teder, Bain and the geometric methodology shown in detail in Appendix A. The arithmetic smoothing methodologies are interesting but are ultimately unnecessary; Karnosky and Singer, although at first sight appearing to be arithmetic, is actually geometric because of the use of continuously compounded returns. The multi-currency geometric methodology is that detailed in Appendix B. The majority of fixed income methodologies are arithmetic in nature, no doubt in part due to smaller excess returns. Wagner and Tito is a variation of Fama decomposition using duration as a measur....

  

You are currently reading a PREVIEW of this book.

                                                                                        

Get instant access to over
$1 million worth of books and videos.

  

Start a Free Trial