Safari Books Online is a digital library providing on-demand subscription access to thousands of learning resources.
A lot of people are shocked when they hear that I shoot sports in JPEG format rather than RAW, but I’m not alone. Many of the pro shooters I know do the exact same thing for two key reasons (the first of which I covered in volume 1 of this book series): (1) You can shoot more continuous shots in JPEG format than in RAW, without filling your camera’s internal memory buffer (see page 125 for more on the buffer issue). DPReview.com (a respected source for this type of data), broke it down this way:
Shooting in RAW: After about 17 RAW photos, your buffer is full.
Shooting in JPEG: You can shoot about 65 or so shots before your buffer is full.
If you’re using fast memory cards (like 600x high-speed cards), that means that if you’re shooting in JPEG, your buffer rarely gets full because of how fast the images write to the memory card, which clears up the buffer for more shots. (2) JPEGs take less time to process. JPEGs get contrast, color enhancements, and sharpening applied within the camera itself, so JPEG images look more “finished” right out of the camera and are nearly ready for publishing without a lot of tweaking. When you set your camera to shoot in RAW, it turns all those in-camera contrast, sharpening, and color enhancements off, because you’ve chosen to do all that yourself later in Camera Raw or Lightroom, which takes more time, as does resaving the images as JPEGs fo....