Dynamic Memory and Classes

What would you like for breakfast, lunch, and dinner for the next month? How many ounces of milk for dinner on the 3rd day? How many raisins in your cereal for breakfast on the 15th day? If you’re like most people, you’d rather postpone some of those decisions until the actual mealtimes. Part of the strategy in C++ is to take the same attitude toward memory allocation, letting the program decide about memory during runtime rather than during compile time. That way, memory use can depend on the needs of a program instead of on a rigid set of storage-class rules. Remember that to gain dynamic control of memory, C++ utilizes the new and delete operators. Unhappily, using these operators with classes can pose some new programming problems. As you’ll see, destructors can become necessary instead of merely ornamental. And sometimes you have to overload an assignment operator to get a program to behave properly. We’ll look into these matters now.

A Review Example and Static Class Members

We haven’t used new and delete for a while, so let’s review them with a short program. While we’re at it, let’s look at a new storage class: the static class member. The vehicle will be a StringBad class, later to be superseded by the slightly more able String class. (You’ve already seen the standard C++ string class, and you’ll learn more about it in Chapter 16, “The string Class and the Standard Template Library.” Meanwhile, the humble StringBad and String classes in this chapter provide some insight into what underlies such a class. A lot of programming techniques go into providing such a friendly interface.)